On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:32:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> I remember this now. Only that one regulator has a non-negligeble
> rise time, so for that reason it's set to that value. Atleast so I was
> told once upon a time when I implemented it, so this patch
> should be fine.
Please resend
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
>> 2012/7/4 Mark Brown :
>>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:31:45AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
Hi Linus,
While working on this patch, I found in original
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2012/7/4 Mark Brown :
>> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:31:45AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
>>> ---
>>> Hi Linus,
>>> While working on this patch, I found in original code:
>>> ab8500_regulator_ops set enable_time callback to
>
2012/7/4 Mark Brown :
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:31:45AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
>> ---
>> Hi Linus,
>> While working on this patch, I found in original code:
>> ab8500_regulator_ops set enable_time callback to
>> ab8500_regulator_enable_time,
>> but does not set the d
4 matches
Mail list logo
