On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> Something in man page format similar to FreeBSD man page:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?bpf(4)
>
> would be more readable and reviewable.
Ok. will chop it into smallest diff possible and will add a doc
for syscall only. I guess
On 08/27/2014 09:18 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Something in man page format similar to FreeBSD man page:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?bpf(4)
would be more readable and reviewable.
I think at some point, we could perhaps do a section 7 page
with a general overview of the engine and wh
Something in man page format similar to FreeBSD man page:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?bpf(4)
would be more readable and reviewable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski
>>> wrote:
On Aug 26, 2014 7:29 PM, "Alexei Starovoit
> I'm personally not reviewing such a large patch series, sorry.
>
> You need to submit smaller sets if you want to get reasonable
> review of your changes and ideas.
Hello. As well, this clogs up the mailing boxes of other people who
have no interest in the patch set.
Thank you,
Steven Stewart-
From: Alexei Starovoitov
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:29:14 -0700
> posting whole thing again as RFC to get feedback on syscall only.
> If syscall bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) is ok,
I'm personally not reviewing such a large patch series, sorry.
You need to submit smaller
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Aug 26, 2014 7:29 PM, "Alexei Starovoitov" wrote:
Hi Ingo, David,
posting whole thing again
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Aug 26, 2014 7:29 PM, "Alexei Starovoitov" wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ingo, David,
>>>
>>> posting whole thing again as RFC to get feedback on syscall only.
>>> If syscall bpf(int cm
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2014 7:29 PM, "Alexei Starovoitov" wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ingo, David,
>>
>> posting whole thing again as RFC to get feedback on syscall only.
>> If syscall bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) is ok,
>> I'll split the
On Aug 26, 2014 7:29 PM, "Alexei Starovoitov" wrote:
>
> Hi Ingo, David,
>
> posting whole thing again as RFC to get feedback on syscall only.
> If syscall bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) is ok,
> I'll split them into small chunks as requested and will repost without RFC.
IM
Hi Ingo, David,
posting whole thing again as RFC to get feedback on syscall only.
If syscall bpf(int cmd, union bpf_attr *attr, unsigned int size) is ok,
I'll split them into small chunks as requested and will repost without RFC.
Right now please only review syscall API
patch 0003 introduces sys_
11 matches
Mail list logo
