Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-10-07 Thread Josh Cartwright
Hey Bjorn- On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:11:36PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 08/27/2013 11:01 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > ... > > cell 0 - address type (0: master, 1: unique ID, 2: group ID, ...) > > I think it would make sense to

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-10-05 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/27/2013 11:01 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > ... > cell 0 - address type (0: master, 1: unique ID, 2: group ID, ...) I think it would make sense to have the master id as a property of the bus, as you could consider this to indicate diff

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-08-28 Thread Stephen Warren
On 08/28/2013 12:00 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:55:19PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/27/2013 11:01 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: >> ... >>> If we want to ensure for the generic bindings that we are fulling >>> characterizing/describing the SPMI bus, then we'll addi

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-08-28 Thread Josh Cartwright
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:55:19PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/27/2013 11:01 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > ... > > If we want to ensure for the generic bindings that we are fulling > > characterizing/describing the SPMI bus, then we'll additionally need to > > tackle an additional identifie

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-08-27 Thread Stephen Warren
On 08/27/2013 11:01 AM, Josh Cartwright wrote: ... > If we want to ensure for the generic bindings that we are fulling > characterizing/describing the SPMI bus, then we'll additionally need to > tackle an additional identified assumption: > > 4. One master per SPMI bus. (The SPMI spec allows fo

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-08-27 Thread Josh Cartwright
Hey Stephen- Thanks for the comments. On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:58:36PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/22/2013 01:59 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright > > --- > > I'm introducing this as an RFC, because there are set of assumptions > > made in this binding spec

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-08-23 Thread Stephen Warren
On 08/22/2013 01:59 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote: > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright > --- > I'm introducing this as an RFC, because there are set of assumptions > made in this binding spec, that currently hold true for the supported > controller/addressing scheme for the Snapdragon 800 series, but don

[PATCH RFC v2 3/5] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation

2013-08-22 Thread Josh Cartwright
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright --- I'm introducing this as an RFC, because there are set of assumptions made in this binding spec, that currently hold true for the supported controller/addressing scheme for the Snapdragon 800 series, but don't necessarily hold true for SPMI in general. 1. No us