On Wed 31-03-21 17:08:03, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 19.03.21 18:33, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2021-03-19 10:14:02 [-0700], Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Let's start a discussion if /dev/
On 19.03.21 18:33, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2021-03-19 10:14:02 [-0700], Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
On 23.03.21 14:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:49PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
More details / findings in patch #1. Patch #2 and #3
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:34:49PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
> fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
>
> More details / findings in patch #1. Patch #2 and #3 perform minor cleanups
> based on remove
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:08:47 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> Wonder if "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" already existed and would have
> worked back then. :)
>
>
Looks like sysrq-c was added in 2005:
commit 86b1ae38c0a62 ("kdump: sysrq trigger mechanism for kexec based
crashdumps")
Thus
On Fri 19-03-21 10:14:02, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> > Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
> > fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
>
> I'll happily do this for the next merge wind
On 19.03.21 19:10, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:34:49 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
The last time I used /dev/kmem was in 2003. While in Germany,
On 19.03.21 18:14, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
I'll happily do this for the next merge window, but would really
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>> Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
>> fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
>
> I'll happily do this for the next merge window, but would really want
>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:34:49 +0100
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
> fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
The last time I used /dev/kmem was in 2003. While in Germany, my home
firewall (in the US) got rooted.
On 2021-03-19 10:14:02 [-0700], Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> > Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
> > fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
>
> I'll happily do this for the next merg
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
> fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
I'll happily do this for the next merge window, but would really want
distros to confirm that they don't
On 19.03.21 15:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
More details / findings in patch #1. Patch #2 and #3 perform minor cleanups
based on removed /dev/kmem support.
As some
Let's start a discussion if /dev/kmem is worth keeping around and
fixing/maintaining or if we should just remove it now for good.
More details / findings in patch #1. Patch #2 and #3 perform minor cleanups
based on removed /dev/kmem support.
Only compile-tested on x86-64 -- good enough for discus
14 matches
Mail list logo
