On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:52:54AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Yes, there was a time when I was firmly against doing such a thing.
> However I'm not sure it is so bad now. More and more SoCs are going to
> keep getting merged into the kernel and that just means more and more
> clock data. Perh
Mike,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:53:07AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> I am using this code while converting the OMAP4 clock data over to DT
I see these basic clk bindings can be useful for platforms that have
a relatively simple clock tree, but I'm a little surprised that you plan
to move OMAP4
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:07 schrieb Mike Turquette:
> This series introduces binding definitions for common register-mapped
> clock multiplexor and divider IP blocks, and the corresponding setup
> functions once they are matched. The bindings are close the struct
> definitions but please don
This series introduces binding definitions for common register-mapped
clock multiplexor and divider IP blocks, and the corresponding setup
functions once they are matched. The bindings are close the struct
definitions but please don't hold that against the binding: the struct
definitions closely m
4 matches
Mail list logo
