On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:12:03PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> motion. If you add in one patch and remove in another the code motion
> trackers don't see it.
Agreed, having the move in a single patch would be nice.
> Thirdly, are you sure the pool structure for NVMe should be the same as
> f
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 16:12 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:39 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > From: Ming Lin
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > This moves the mempool based chained scatterlist alloc/free code
> > from
> > scsi_lib.c to lib/scatterlist.c.
> >
> > So other drivers(for
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:39 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> From: Ming Lin
>
> Hi list,
>
> This moves the mempool based chained scatterlist alloc/free code from
> scsi_lib.c to lib/scatterlist.c.
>
> So other drivers(for example, the under development NVMe over fabric
> drivers) can also use it.
>
From: Ming Lin
Hi list,
This moves the mempool based chained scatterlist alloc/free code from
scsi_lib.c to lib/scatterlist.c.
So other drivers(for example, the under development NVMe over fabric drivers)
can also use it.
Ming Lin (2):
scatterlist: add mempool based chained SG alloc/free api
4 matches
Mail list logo
