On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:32 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:05 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
>>> A while ago I was trying to build a seccomp-bpf filter program that would
>>> survive a change of x86 architecture. This was
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:05 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
>> A while ago I was trying to build a seccomp-bpf filter program that would
>> survive a change of x86 architecture. This was complicated for all sorts of
>> reasons, but one of the probl
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:05 AM, David Drysdale wrote:
> A while ago I was trying to build a seccomp-bpf filter program that would
> survive a change of x86 architecture. This was complicated for all sorts of
> reasons, but one of the problems was that the different syscall numbers aren't
> all a
A while ago I was trying to build a seccomp-bpf filter program that would
survive a change of x86 architecture. This was complicated for all sorts of
reasons, but one of the problems was that the different syscall numbers aren't
all available at the same time -- hence this patch.
Naming-wise, And
4 matches
Mail list logo
