Re: [PATCH RFC] tun, macvtap: higher order allocations for skbs

2015-06-29 Thread Jason Wang
On 06/29/2015 12:50 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 06/18/2015 06:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this? >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >> --- >> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +- >> drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 inse

Re: [PATCH RFC] tun, macvtap: higher order allocations for skbs

2015-06-28 Thread Jason Wang
On 06/18/2015 06:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this? > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ne

Re: [PATCH RFC] tun, macvtap: higher order allocations for skbs

2015-06-18 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 18.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > > Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this? > Can you explain the motivation? > FWIW, basic networking between two guest over macvtap still > seems to work o

Re: [PATCH RFC] tun, macvtap: higher order allocations for skbs

2015-06-18 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 18.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin: > Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this? Can you explain the motivation? FWIW, basic networking between two guest over macvtap still seems to work on s390 so I dont see any obvious regression. Christian > > Signed-off-by: Mich

[PATCH RFC] tun, macvtap: higher order allocations for skbs

2015-06-18 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this? Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +- drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c index 928f3f4..80e87e4 100644 --