On 12/12, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> The delay here is not in atomic context and does not seem critical with
> respect to precision, but usleep_range(min,max) with min==max results in
> giving the timer subsystem no room to optimize uncritical delays. Fix
> this by setting the range to 2000,3000
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:40:09AM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> The delay here is not in atomic context and does not seem critical with
> respect to precision, but usleep_range(min,max) with min==max results in
> giving the timer subsystem no room to optimize uncritical delays. Fix
> this by
The delay here is not in atomic context and does not seem critical with
respect to precision, but usleep_range(min,max) with min==max results in
giving the timer subsystem no room to optimize uncritical delays. Fix
this by setting the range to 2000,3000 us.
Fixes: commit f05259a6ffa4 ("clk: wm83
3 matches
Mail list logo
