On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 23:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Can one of you please respond to this patch?
>
> Oops. Slipped through the cracks. Picked it up. Shouldn't it be tagged
> for stable?
Right. Please add:
Fixes: d1a797f388d6 ("x32: Handle
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Can one of you please respond to this patch?
Oops. Slipped through the cracks. Picked it up. Shouldn't it be tagged
for stable?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Can one of you please respond to this patch?
Ben.
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 21:05 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It is currently possible to execve() an x32 executable on an x86_64
> kernel that has only ia32 compat enabled. However all its syscalls
> will fail, even _exit(). This usually causes it
It is currently possible to execve() an x32 executable on an x86_64
kernel that has only ia32 compat enabled. However all its syscalls
will fail, even _exit(). This usually causes it to segfault.
Change the ELF compat architecture check so that x32 executables are
rejected if we don't support th
4 matches
Mail list logo