On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
> it.
> if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next tree.
The removal of notification API looks fine. Thanks for refreshing this.
Thanks,
Am
On Monday, September 10, 2012, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
> it.
> if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next tree.
>
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:11:40 +0530
>
> This patch
On Monday, September 10, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, September 10, 2012, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
> > it.
> > if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next tree.
> >
> > From: Amit Dan
On δΈ€, 2012-09-10 at 09:50 +0300, Valentin, Eduardo wrote:
> Hello Rui and Amit,
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
> > it.
> > if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next
Hello Rui and Amit,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of
> it.
> if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next tree.
>
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:11:4
Refreshed to remove the notifier mechanism as we do not have a real user of it.
if there is no problem, I'll apply the whole patch set to thermal next tree.
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:11:40 +0530
This patchset introduces a new generic cooling device based on cpufreq
that
6 matches
Mail list logo
