On Monday 07 November 2016 04:18 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> There is no need to access regmap of coupled phy to check its state - such
> information is already in the phy device itself, so use it directly. This
> let us to avoid possible access to registers of the device in the disabled
> powe
Hello Marek,
On 11/08/2016 03:27 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
>
> On 2016-11-07 19:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 11/07/2016 07:48 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> There is no need to access regmap of coupled phy to check its state - such
>>> information is already in the
Hi Javier,
On 2016-11-07 19:50, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On 11/07/2016 07:48 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
There is no need to access regmap of coupled phy to check its state - such
information is already in the phy device itself, so use it directly. This
let us to avoid possible access t
Hello Marek,
On 11/07/2016 07:48 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> There is no need to access regmap of coupled phy to check its state - such
> information is already in the phy device itself, so use it directly. This
> let us to avoid possible access to registers of the device in the disabled
> power
There is no need to access regmap of coupled phy to check its state - such
information is already in the phy device itself, so use it directly. This
let us to avoid possible access to registers of the device in the disabled
power domain if the coupled phy is already disabled.
Signed-off-by: Marek
5 matches
Mail list logo
