On 9/11/19 4:19 AM, Heiher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:48 AM Jason Baron wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/5/19 1:27 PM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>> On 2019-09-05 11:56, Heiher wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Heiher wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I created an ep
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:48 AM Jason Baron wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/5/19 1:27 PM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> > On 2019-09-05 11:56, Heiher wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Heiher wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I created an epoll wakeup test project, listed some possible c
On 9/5/19 1:27 PM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-09-05 11:56, Heiher wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Heiher wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I created an epoll wakeup test project, listed some possible cases,
>>> and any other corner cases needs to be added?
>>>
>>> https://githu
On 2019-09-05 11:56, Heiher wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Heiher wrote:
Hi,
I created an epoll wakeup test project, listed some possible cases,
and any other corner cases needs to be added?
https://github.com/heiher/epoll-wakeup/blob/master/README.md
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Heiher wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I created an epoll wakeup test project, listed some possible cases,
> and any other corner cases needs to be added?
>
> https://github.com/heiher/epoll-wakeup/blob/master/README.md
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:02 PM Heiher wrote:
> >
Hi,
I created an epoll wakeup test project, listed some possible cases,
and any other corner cases needs to be added?
https://github.com/heiher/epoll-wakeup/blob/master/README.md
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:02 PM Heiher wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:02 PM Jason Baron wrote:
> >
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:02 PM Jason Baron wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/4/19 5:57 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> > On 2019-09-03 23:08, Jason Baron wrote:
> >> On 9/2/19 11:36 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This is indeed a bug. (quick side note: could you please remove efd[1]
> >>> from y
On 9/4/19 5:57 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-09-03 23:08, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On 9/2/19 11:36 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is indeed a bug. (quick side note: could you please remove efd[1]
>>> from your test, because it is not related to the reproduction of a
>>> current
On 2019-09-03 23:08, Jason Baron wrote:
On 9/2/19 11:36 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
Hi,
This is indeed a bug. (quick side note: could you please remove efd[1]
from your test, because it is not related to the reproduction of a
current bug).
Your patch lacks a good description, what exactly you've
On 9/2/19 11:36 AM, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is indeed a bug. (quick side note: could you please remove efd[1]
> from your test, because it is not related to the reproduction of a
> current bug).
>
> Your patch lacks a good description, what exactly you've fixed. Let
> me speak out
Hi,
This is indeed a bug. (quick side note: could you please remove efd[1]
from your test, because it is not related to the reproduction of a
current bug).
Your patch lacks a good description, what exactly you've fixed. Let
me speak out loud and please correct me if I'm wrong, my understanding
From: Heiher
The structure of event pools:
efd[1]: { efd[2] (EPOLLIN) }efd[0]: { efd[2] (EPOLLIN | EPOLLET) }
| |
+-+-+
|
v
12 matches
Mail list logo
