On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 22:58 +, Maarten Bressers wrote:
> > This patch is too simplistic. ide-cd.c:ide_cdrom_drive_status() looks
> > to be a reasonable implementation. However, the worry is that
> > GET_EVENT_NOTIFICATION is a MMC command; devices not conforming to MMC
> > won't support it.
> This patch is too simplistic. ide-cd.c:ide_cdrom_drive_status() looks
> to be a reasonable implementation. However, the worry is that
> GET_EVENT_NOTIFICATION is a MMC command; devices not conforming to MMC
> won't support it. In theory, they should just return ILLEGAL_REQUEST,
> but USB devic
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 22:30 +, Maarten Bressers wrote:
> From: David Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Greetings,
>
> The following patch was submitted to the lkml in 2004 by David Martin
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/27/1). It wasn't accepted, but I was
> unable to find a reason why, so I'm r
From: David Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Greetings,
The following patch was submitted to the lkml in 2004 by David Martin
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/27/1). It wasn't accepted, but I was
unable to find a reason why, so I'm resending it now.
Without this patch the SCSI ioctl CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS al
4 matches
Mail list logo