Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block: add missing group association in bio-cloning functions

2016-05-10 Thread Paolo
Il 10/05/2016 23:34, Jeff Moyer ha scritto: Paolo Valente writes: diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c index 807d25e..e9b136a 100644 --- a/block/bio.c +++ b/block/bio.c @@ -622,6 +622,8 @@ struct bio *bio_clone_fast(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio_set *bs) }

Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block: add missing group association in bio-cloning functions

2016-05-10 Thread Jeff Moyer
Paolo Valente writes: > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c > index 807d25e..e9b136a 100644 > --- a/block/bio.c > +++ b/block/bio.c > @@ -622,6 +622,8 @@ struct bio *bio_clone_fast(struct bio *bio, gfp_t > gfp_mask, struct bio_set *bs) > } > } > > + bio_clone_blkcg_a

Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2] block: add missing group association in bio-cloning functions

2016-05-10 Thread Tejun Heo
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:02:12PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: > When a bio is cloned, the newly created bio must be associated with > the same blkcg as the original bio (if BLK_CGROUP is enabled). If > this operation is not performed, then the new bio is not associated > with any group, and the gr

[PATCH BUGFIX V2] block: add missing group association in bio-cloning functions

2016-05-10 Thread Paolo Valente
When a bio is cloned, the newly created bio must be associated with the same blkcg as the original bio (if BLK_CGROUP is enabled). If this operation is not performed, then the new bio is not associated with any group, and the group of the current task is returned when the group of the bio is reques