Corey Minyard wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Bela Lubkin wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
>> statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL
>> and remove all those intialisa
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Bela Lubkin wrote:
>>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>
> Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
> statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and
> remove
> all those intialisations? They're unneeded,
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bela Lubkin wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>> Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
> >>> statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and remove
> >>> all those intialisations? They're unneeded, they inc
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:35:05 -0600
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you prefer patches to fold into the existing patches or new versions?
Incremental updates are preferred where it makes sense, please. That way
we can see what changed. I often will convert updated patches into
incr
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Bela Lubkin wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>> Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
>>> statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and remove
>>> all those intialisations? They're unneeded, they increase the vmlinux
>>> image
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Bela Lubkin wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and
remove
all those intialisations? They're unneeded, they increase the vmlinux
image size and there ar
Bela Lubkin wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and remove
all those intialisations? They're unneeded, they increase the vmlinux
image size and there are quite a number of the
Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
> > statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and remove
> > all those intialisations? They're unneeded, they increase the vmlinux
> > image size and there are quite a number of them. Th
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:35:05 -0600 Corey Minyard wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:37:46 -0600
> > Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> +static void (*atca_oem_poweroff_hook)(ipmi_user_t user) = NULL;
> >>
> >
> > Sometime, please go through the IPMI
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:35:05 -0600 Corey Minyard wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:37:46 -0600
> > Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> +static void (*atca_oem_poweroff_hook)(ipmi_user_t user) = NULL;
> >>
> >
> > Sometime, please go through the IPMI
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:37:46 -0600
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+static void (*atca_oem_poweroff_hook)(ipmi_user_t user) = NULL;
Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NU
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:37:46 -0600
Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +static void (*atca_oem_poweroff_hook)(ipmi_user_t user) = NULL;
Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and remove
all those intiali
X86 boards generally use ACPI for the power management interactions
with the BMC. However, non-x86 boards need some help. This patch
adds the help for the Motorola PigeonPoint-based IPMCs.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index:
13 matches
Mail list logo
