On 9/28/20 1:18 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
On 9/28/20 6:02 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 11:21:59PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
...
+gcc -c $tmpfile_c -o $tmpfile_o >/dev/null 2>&1
This gcc has to come from some makefile variable
I plan on posting a v2 with this additional
On 9/28/20 6:02 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 11:21:59PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
...
+gcc -c $tmpfile_c -o $tmpfile_o >/dev/null 2>&1
This gcc has to come from some makefile variable
ahem, yes, that really should have just been $(CC), will change to that.
This is
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 11:21:59PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> @@ -76,8 +79,6 @@ TEST_FILES := test_vmalloc.sh
> KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1
> include ../lib.mk
>
> -$(OUTPUT)/hmm-tests: LDLIBS += -lhugetlbfs
> -
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> BINARIES_32 := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(BINARIES_32))
>
HMM selftests are incredibly useful, but they are only effective if
people actually build and run them. All the other tests in selftests/vm
can be built with very standard, always-available libraries: libpthread,
librt. The hmm-tests.c program, on the other hand, requires something
that is (much) l
4 matches
Mail list logo
