On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> @@ -2276,7 +2277,10 @@ static int cryptocop_job_setup(struct
> >> cryptocop_prio_job **pj, struct cryptocop_
> >>(*pj)->iop->ctx_in.saved_data = operation->list_op.inlist;
> >>(*pj)->iop->ctx_in.saved_data_buf =
> >> op
>> @@ -2276,7 +2277,10 @@ static int cryptocop_job_setup(struct
>> cryptocop_prio_job **pj, struct cryptocop_
>> (*pj)->iop->ctx_in.saved_data = operation->list_op.inlist;
>> (*pj)->iop->ctx_in.saved_data_buf =
>> operation->list_op.in_data_buf;
>> } else {
>> -
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:23:06 +0200
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" can point out that assignments should usually
> not be performed within condition checks.
> Thus move the assignments for a local variable to separate stat
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:23:06 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" can point out that assignments should usually
not be performed within condition checks.
Thus move the assignments for a local variable to separate statements
in three functions.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
-
4 matches
Mail list logo
