Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/fpu: rename lazy restore functions to "register state valid"

2016-10-04 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, wrote: > From: Rik van Riel > > Name the functions after the state they track, rather than the function > they currently enable. This should make it more obvious when we use the > fpu_register_state_valid function for something else in the future. I like this. R

[PATCH 7/9] x86/fpu: rename lazy restore functions to "register state valid"

2016-10-04 Thread riel
From: Rik van Riel Name the functions after the state they track, rather than the function they currently enable. This should make it more obvious when we use the fpu_register_state_valid function for something else in the future. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/intern