On 11/04/2013 04:45 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Mon 04-11-13 15:26:38, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 01-11-13 15:38:50, Cody P Schafer wrote:
Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modifies the tree
Thanks. I've merge
On Mon 04-11-13 15:26:38, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 01-11-13 15:38:50, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> > Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
> > of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modifies the tree
> Thanks. I've merged the patch into my tree.
Hum, e
On Fri 01-11-13 15:38:50, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
> of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modifies the tree
Thanks. I've merged the patch into my tree.
Use rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() to destroy the rbtree instead
of opencoding an alternate postorder iteration that modifies the tree
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer
---
fs/ext3/dir.c | 36 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a
4 matches
Mail list logo