Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Use register_sysctl_table() for sysctls.
>>
>
> yes - i just wanted to point out the incompatibility and subtle breakage
> that this change caused. I'll now have to convert the current code over
> to sysctl_table, whic
* Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However it has always been a bug for anything under /proc/sys to not
> be a sysctl. It's not subtle breakage but subtle enforcement of the
> existing rules.
it wasnt really a bug but an uncleanliness - but yeah. The way i used it
is pretty much
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > #define PROCNAME_PML"sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency"
>> >
>> > static __init int latency_fs_init(void)
>> > {
>> > struct proc_dir_entry *
* Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > #define PROCNAME_PML"sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency"
> >
> > static __init int latency_fs_init(void)
> > {
> > struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> >
> > if (!(entry = create_proc_
On 3/14/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#define PROCNAME_PML"sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency"
static __init int latency_fs_init(void)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
if (!(entry = create_proc_entry(PROCNAME_PML, 0644, NULL)))
printk("latency_f
* Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
>
> With this change the sysctl inodes can be cached and nothing needs to
> be done when removing a sysctl table.
your change is now upstream:
commit 77b14db502cb85a031fe8fde6c85d52f3e0ac
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
With this change the sysctl inodes can be cached and
nothing needs to be done when removing a sysctl table.
For a costk of 2K code we will save about 4K of static tables
(when we remove de from ctl_table) and 70K in proc_dir_entries
that we w
7 matches
Mail list logo
