Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-30 Thread Ronald Warsow
On 29.10.20 20:17, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:42:09PM +0100, Ronald Warsow wrote: On 29.10.20 10:14, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:09:52PM +0100, Ronald Warsow wrote: Hallo this rc1 runs here (pure Intel-box) without errors. Thanks ! An RPC (I'm thinking about sin

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-29 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:42:09PM +0100, Ronald Warsow wrote: > On 29.10.20 10:14, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:09:52PM +0100, Ronald Warsow wrote: > > > Hallo > > > > > > this rc1 runs here (pure Intel-box) without errors. > > > Thanks ! > > > > > > > > > An RPC (I'm thinking

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-29 Thread Ronald Warsow
On 29.10.20 10:14, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:09:52PM +0100, Ronald Warsow wrote: Hallo this rc1 runs here (pure Intel-box) without errors. Thanks ! An RPC (I'm thinking about since some month) == Wouldn't it be better (and not so much add. work) to sort the Pseudo-Shortlo

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:13:01AM +, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 27/10/2020 13:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. > > There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issu

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-29 Thread Jon Hunter
On 27/10/2020 13:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. > There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses sho

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-29 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:09:52PM +0100, Ronald Warsow wrote: > Hallo > > this rc1 runs here (pure Intel-box) without errors. > Thanks ! > > > An RPC (I'm thinking about since some month) > == > > Wouldn't it be better (and not so much add. work) to sort the > Pseudo-Shortlog towards subsy

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-28 Thread Guenter Roeck
Retry On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:12:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 02:44:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. > > There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-27 Thread Naresh Kamboju
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 20:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. > There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Resp

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-27 Thread Ronald Warsow
Hallo this rc1 runs here (pure Intel-box) without errors. Thanks ! An RPC (I'm thinking about since some month) == Wouldn't it be better (and not so much add. work) to sort the Pseudo-Shortlog towards subsystem/driver ? something like this: ... usb: gadget: f_ncm: allow using NCM in Supe

Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-27 Thread Jeffrin Jose T
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 14:44 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. > There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a > response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, > please > let me know. >

[PATCH 5.9 000/757] 5.9.2-rc1 review

2020-10-27 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.2 release. There are 757 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:52:54 +. Anything rece