Re: [PATCH 5.2 123/413] PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 1:50 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:31 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > [ Upstream commit c2bf1fc212f7e6f25ace1af8f0b3ac061ea48ba5 ] > > > > > > Currently Linux does n

Re: [PATCH 5.2 123/413] PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec

Hi, On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 08:50:00AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:31 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > [ Upstream commit c2bf1fc212f7e6f25ace1af8f0b3ac061ea48ba5 ] > > > > > > Currently

Re: [PATCH 5.2 123/413] PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:31 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > [ Upstream commit c2bf1fc212f7e6f25ace1af8f0b3ac061ea48ba5 ] > > > > Currently Linux does not follow PCIe spec regarding the required delays > > after reset. A concr

Re: [PATCH 5.2 123/413] PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:31 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > [ Upstream commit c2bf1fc212f7e6f25ace1af8f0b3ac061ea48ba5 ] > > Currently Linux does not follow PCIe spec regarding the required delays > after reset. A concrete example is a Thunderbolt add-in-card that > consists of a PCIe switch and

[PATCH 5.2 123/413] PCI: Add missing link delays required by the PCIe spec

[ Upstream commit c2bf1fc212f7e6f25ace1af8f0b3ac061ea48ba5 ] Currently Linux does not follow PCIe spec regarding the required delays after reset. A concrete example is a Thunderbolt add-in-card that consists of a PCIe switch and two PCIe endpoints: +-1b.0-[01-6b]00.0-[02-6b]--+-00.0-[03]---