On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 07:10 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
>>> Mask the GPIO interrupt while its type is being changed, just in case
>>> it can prevent a spurious interrupt.
>>
>> "Just in
On 10/03/2017 07:10 PM, Gregory Fong wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
>> Mask the GPIO interrupt while its type is being changed, just in case
>> it can prevent a spurious interrupt.
>
> "Just in case"? I don't have access to hardware documentation for
>
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> Mask the GPIO interrupt while its type is being changed, just in case
> it can prevent a spurious interrupt.
"Just in case"? I don't have access to hardware documentation for
this anymore, but I'd expect to some stronger claim that
Mask the GPIO interrupt while its type is being changed, just in case
it can prevent a spurious interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
i
4 matches
Mail list logo