Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Jacob Shin wrote: > Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and > [ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up > pfn_mapped ranges instead. please swap patch 5 and patch 4 applying sequence. aka. should have [PAT

[PATCH 5/6] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped

Update code that previously assumed pfns [ 0 - max_low_pfn_mapped ) and [ 4GB - max_pfn_mapped ) were always direct mapped, to now look up pfn_mapped ranges instead. Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c |6 +- arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c |8 2 files chan