> >> Frankly, I am not a big fan of converting board files if we cannot test
> >> the changes.
> >
> > So, if no one is using that old boards, should we really take care
> > more than just compile test?
> >
> > P.S. Legacy platform data makes a burden of development nowadays.
> > Built-in device
On 30/06/17 22:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>
- i2c->algo_data.i2c_clock = 59000;
+ ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev,
"clock-frequency",
+ &
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> > - i2c->algo_data.i2c_clock = 59000;
>> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev,
>> > "clock-frequency",
>> > + &i2c->algo_data.i2c_clock);
>> > +
> > - i2c->algo_data.i2c_clock = 59000;
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev,
> > "clock-frequency",
> > + &i2c->algo_data.i2c_clock);
> > + if (ret)
> > + i2c->algo_data.i2c_cl
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Chris Packham
wrote:
> Use device_property_read_u32 instead of of_property_read_u32_index to
> lookup the "clock-frequency" property.
My comments below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 9 -
> 1 file chang
Use device_property_read_u32 instead of of_property_read_u32_index to
lookup the "clock-frequency" property.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
