Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:18:12PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:18:03AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:30:46PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Yes. I don't recall if it is a direct --force or if you would have to
> > > remove the original tag first (with git push :refs/tags/).
> >
> > Ah, but then if
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:30:46PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Yes. I don't recall if it is a direct --force or if you would have to
> > remove the original tag first (with git push :refs/tags/).
>
> Ah, but then if someone had pulled the old tag, they would have to
> delete it locally b
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:30:46PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:18:12PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Yes. I don't recall if it is a direct --force or if you would have to
> > remove the original tag first (with git push :refs/tags/).
> Ah, but then if someone
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:18:12PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> >
> > > > Does it make sense to cre
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Rebasing shouldn't be an issue for tags (they're not branches), and
> > changes would a disaster no matter what.
> Can you push --force a tag? I've never tried th
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:38:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > Does it make sense to create tags for the RC(s) so git describe gets
> > > > it right? Given the r
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
>
> > > Does it make sense to create tags for the RC(s) so git describe gets
> > > it right? Given the right ve
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:36:55AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
>
> > > Does it make sense to create tags for the RC(s) so git describe gets
> > > it right? Given the right ve
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 08:22:13AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> > Does it make sense to create tags for the RC(s) so git describe gets
> > it right? Given the right version is in the Makefile kinda feels like
> > that'd be a belt and sus
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Results from testing on
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
>>
>> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Results from testing on Linaro’s small but growing test farm.
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:58:14AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.50 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
>
> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.50 release.
> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.50 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
On 09/12/2017 10:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.50 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses sh
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.50 release.
There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Sep 14 16:52:45 UTC 2017.
Anything receive
18 matches
Mail list logo
