Re: [PATCH 4.14 16/89] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex

2018-01-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:48:55AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >> > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me >> > know. >> >

Re: [PATCH 4.14 16/89] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex

2018-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:48:55AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > -- > > > > From: Peter Zijlstra > > > > commit

Re: [PATCH 4.14 16/89] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex

2018-01-22 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Peter Zijlstra > > commit c1e2f0eaf015fb7076d51a339011f2383e6dd389 upstream. May be a bit premature, given the fish

[PATCH 4.14 16/89] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex

2018-01-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Peter Zijlstra commit c1e2f0eaf015fb7076d51a339011f2383e6dd389 upstream. Julia reported futex state corruption in the following scenario: waiter waker