On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 20:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 01:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support
> > > > safe all-cpu backtracing from N
* Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 01:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >
> > > Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support
> > > safe all-cpu backtracing from NMI has been copied to printk.c to
> > > make it accessible to othe
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 01:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Thompson wrote:
>
> > Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support
> > safe all-cpu backtracing from NMI has been copied to printk.c to
> > make it accessible to other architectures.
> >
> > Port the x86 N
* Daniel Thompson wrote:
> Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support
> safe all-cpu backtracing from NMI has been copied to printk.c to
> make it accessible to other architectures.
>
> Port the x86 NMI backtrace to the generic code.
Is there any difference between
Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support safe
all-cpu backtracing from NMI has been copied to printk.c to make it
accessible to other architectures.
Port the x86 NMI backtrace to the generic code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson
Cc: Steven Rostedt
Cc: Thomas Gleixner
5 matches
Mail list logo