Please ignore. Wrong patch set.
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> It was forgotten to initialize ret to the result of calling
> snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk, unlike at the other calls in the same function.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this
From: Julia Lawall
It was forgotten to initialize ret to the result of calling
snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk, unlike at the other calls in the same function.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
(
if@p1 (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\
From: Julia Lawall
It was forgotten to initialize ret to the result of calling
snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk, unlike at the other calls in the same function.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
(
if@p1 (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\
On 08/19/2012 10:03 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> It was forgotten to initialize ret to the result of calling
> snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk, unlike at the other calls in the same function.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http
From: Julia Lawall
It was forgotten to initialize ret to the result of calling
snd_soc_dai_set_sysclk, unlike at the other calls in the same function.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
(
if@p1 (\(ret < 0\|ret != 0\
5 matches
Mail list logo