...and again in plaintext, sorry about that.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
>> > Devicetree bindings should be in vendor,prefix format. This doesn't
>> > represent every aspect of coreboot, so it needs a more descriptive
>> > string.
>>
>> Any particular suggestion? I supp
Hi Mark,
Julius can correct me if I'm wrong on any of this, but a quick note that
probably should have prefaced this:
These bindings were submitted years go
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/359672/
[PATCH] firmware: Add device tree binding for coreboot
discussed, and resubmitted seemingly acc
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:04:28PM +0100, Thierry Escande wrote:
> From: Julius Werner
>
> This patch adds documentation describing a device tree binding for the
> coreboot firmware. It is meant to be dynamically added during boot and
> contains address definitions for the coreboot table (a list
From: Julius Werner
This patch adds documentation describing a device tree binding for the
coreboot firmware. It is meant to be dynamically added during boot and
contains address definitions for the coreboot table (a list of
variable-sized descriptors providing information about various compile-
4 matches
Mail list logo
