2013/3/8, Jaegeuk Kim :
> 2013-03-04 (월), 15:25 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
>> 2013/3/3, Jaegeuk Kim :
>> > We should not change the on-disk layout.
>> > Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition
>> > check
>> > like below.
>>
>> Even though the changes you suggested are ok. But th
2013-03-04 (월), 15:25 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> 2013/3/3, Jaegeuk Kim :
> > We should not change the on-disk layout.
> > Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition check
> > like below.
>
> Even though the changes you suggested are ok. But there is one doubt.
> By not changing
2013/3/3, Jaegeuk Kim :
> We should not change the on-disk layout.
> Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition check
> like below.
Even though the changes you suggested are ok. But there is one doubt.
By not changing the on-disk layout and just taking care of the limits
us
We should not change the on-disk layout.
Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition check
like below.
---
From ccc2546eded1efd2d6ed98f8aee7d7ce247cb4a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 13:58:05 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: align f2fs maximum
From: Namjae Jeon
Since, maximum filename length supported in linux is 255 characters.
So, there is no need to reserve space for 256 characters in f2fs inode.
This aligns the filename length to NFS requests also which also
has a default limit of '255'.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon
Signed-off-by:
5 matches
Mail list logo
