On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
>>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>>> @@ -405,37 +405,29 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> @@ -405,37 +405,29 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
>> * A newly forked process directly context switches into thi
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -405,37 +405,29 @@ END(__switch_to_asm)
> * A newly forked process directly context switches into this address.
> *
> * rax: prev task we switched from
> + * r
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
>> Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
>> function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
>> of struct fork_frame.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
> function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
> of struct fork_frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst
Seems reasonable. Can you make sure you explicitl
Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
of struct fork_frame.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S| 28 +++-
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S| 30 ++
6 matches
Mail list logo
