[Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers/bus: make arm-ccn.c driver explicitly non-modular] On
29/03/2016 (Tue 12:53) Pawel Moll wrote:
> Dnia 2016-03-29, Tue o godzinie 12:45 +0100, Will Deacon pisze:
> > I'd much rather fix the driver to build as a module, if at all
> > possible.
> >
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 13:30 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:53:06PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Dnia 2016-03-29, Tue o godzinie 12:45 +0100, Will Deacon pisze:
> > > I'd much rather fix the driver to build as a module, if at all
> > > possible.
> > > Suzuki (CC'd) is taking
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:53:06PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Dnia 2016-03-29, Tue o godzinie 12:45 +0100, Will Deacon pisze:
> > I'd much rather fix the driver to build as a module, if at all
> > possible.
> > Suzuki (CC'd) is taking a look at that, so please drop this patch for
> > now.
>
> Ther
Dnia 2016-03-29, Tue o godzinie 12:45 +0100, Will Deacon pisze:
> I'd much rather fix the driver to build as a module, if at all
> possible.
> Suzuki (CC'd) is taking a look at that, so please drop this patch for
> now.
There's no problem with building arm-ccn.c as a module - all it's
really doing
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 05:10:58PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig for this driver is currently:
>
> config ARM_CCN
> bool "ARM CCN driver support"
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orph
The Kconfig for this driver is currently:
config ARM_CCN
bool "ARM CCN driver support"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
W
6 matches
Mail list logo
