Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + brelse(bh);
>
> A little fyi: brelse() is rather old-fashioned, and has a usually unneeded
> test for non-null bh in it. In situations where we know that the pointer is
> valid, let's please use put_bh().
That's what was in the old romfs
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:51:06 +
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + brelse(bh);
A little fyi: brelse() is rather old-fashioned, and has a usually unneeded
test for non-null bh in it. In situations where we know that the pointer is
valid, let's please use put_bh().
Anywa
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession
of the block layer - as well as using block devices.
This permits RomFS:
(1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if
the underlying dev
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Change RomFS so that it can use MTD devices directly - without the intercession
of the block layer - as well as using block devices.
This permits RomFS:
(1) to use the MTD direct mapping facility available under NOMMU conditions if
the underlying dev
4 matches
Mail list logo
