On 02/23/2014 04:05 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Ray Strode wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2014 9:27 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>>> How about this:
>>>
>>> + driver = cs[i]->device(cs[i], &index);
>>> +/* special case for t
Hi
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2014 9:27 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote:
>> How about this:
>>
>> + driver = cs[i]->device(cs[i], &index);
>> +/* special case for tty0 which must not be resolved */
>> + if (dri
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> And of course, checking for "!tty0" is the proper check for serial console.
> Which, of course, means we have to stay with a broken kernel interface for
> ever and ever.
>
> Innovation, here we come.
So just so we're clear:
1) you ha
Hi,
(resending because my phone tried to send the reply as html mail and
it got rejected)
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:27 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> > How about this:
>
> + driver = cs[i]->device(cs[i], &index);
> +/* special case for tty0 which must not be resolved *
Hi
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 11:18 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ray, Josh, can I get some more information about this? Is this broken
>>> in Linus's tree? Or did I get t
On 02/22/2014 08:25 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
Why did the tty0 change to tty1 now? That doesn't look like a "driver
name" vs. "device name" issue?
I don't know if it's intention
Hi
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> Why did the tty0 change to tty1 now? That doesn't look like a "driver
>> name" vs. "device name" issue?
>
> I don't know if it's intentional, but the patch does:
> +
On 02/21/2014 11:18 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
Ray, Josh, can I get some more information about this? Is this broken
in Linus's tree? Or did I get the backport wrong here?
I don't think it's a problem with the backport specifically.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Why did the tty0 change to tty1 now? That doesn't look like a "driver
> name" vs. "device name" issue?
I don't know if it's intentional, but the patch does:
+ int index = cs[i]->index;
...
+ driver = cs[i]->de
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> Ray, Josh, can I get some more information about this? Is this broken
> in Linus's tree? Or did I get the backport wrong here?
I don't think it's a problem with the backport specifically. To be
honest, i'm not even 100% sure it is
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:48:46AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > 3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Hannes Reinecke
> >
> > commit d8a5dc3033af2fd6d1603
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 02/21/2014 03:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> wrote:
3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:52:44PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 03:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> >> 3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> >> know.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
On 02/21/2014 09:52 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 02/21/2014 03:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hannes Reinecke
commit d8a5dc3033af2fd6d
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 03:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> 3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> From: Hannes Rei
On 02/21/2014 03:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> 3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> --
>>
>> From: Hannes Reinecke
>>
>> commit d8a5dc3033af2fd6d16030d2ee4fbd073460fe54 upstr
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> 3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Hannes Reinecke
>
> commit d8a5dc3033af2fd6d16030d2ee4fbd073460fe54 upstream.
>
> The 'active' sysfs attribute should refer to
3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hannes Reinecke
commit d8a5dc3033af2fd6d16030d2ee4fbd073460fe54 upstream.
The 'active' sysfs attribute should refer to the currently active tty
devices the console is running on, not the curre
18 matches
Mail list logo
