Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/91] 3.12.52-stable review

2016-01-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:37:07AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > Hello Jiry, > > On 01/05/2016 07:46 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.52 release. > > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyo

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/91] 3.12.52-stable review

2016-01-05 Thread Nikolay Borisov
Hello Jiry, On 01/05/2016 07:46 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.52 release. > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Can you pl

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/91] 3.12.52-stable review

2016-01-05 Thread Shuah Khan
On 01/05/2016 10:46 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.52 release. > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be

Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/91] 3.12.52-stable review

2016-01-05 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:46:04PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.52 release. > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > R

[PATCH 3.12 00/91] 3.12.52-stable review

2016-01-05 Thread Jiri Slaby
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.52 release. There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Thu Jan 7 18:43:42 CET 2016. Anything receiv