Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:52:52PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Here we are; > > Build results: > total: 123 pass: 123 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 75 pass: 75 fail: 0 > > Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. Excellent, thank you Guenter! Willy

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 06/07/2016 10:49 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Guenter, On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:54:53AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Jiri provides a branch for 3.12, exactly as you suggested. In his case it is named stable-3.12-queue. Sasha does the same, with linux-3.18.y-queue and linux-4.1.y-queue. Both

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:49:53PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Now done. Please find it here : > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wtarreau/linux-stable.git > linux-3.10.y-queue > > It's a fork of Greg's linux-stable. I cleaned it up from irrelevant > tags and branches. If y

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Guenter, On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:54:53AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Jiri provides a branch for 3.12, exactly as you suggested. In his case it is > > named stable-3.12-queue. Sasha does the same, with linux-3.18.y-queue and > > linux-4.1.y-queue. Both force-push as needed. I don't see a

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 06/06/2016 10:17 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:30:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > Do you have a repository, either with the patch > > > > > series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the buil

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 06/06/2016 10:17 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:30:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: Do you have a repository, either with the patch series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the builder could pick it up ? I don't but I can set something up for you. Would you be OK w

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:30:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Do you have a repository, either with the patch > > > series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the builder could > > > pick it up ? > > > > I don't but I can set something up for you. Would you be OK with a > > branch in my

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
Hi Willy, On 06/06/2016 09:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Guenter, On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:46:57PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: The whole patch series can be found in one patch at : https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/s

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-06 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Guenter, On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:46:57PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at : > > > > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.102-rc1.gz > > > > H

Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.102 release. > All patches will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any > issue with these being applied, please let me know. If anyone thinks some > important p

[PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

2016-06-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.102 release. All patches will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issue with these being applied, please let me know. If anyone thinks some important patches are missing and should be added prior to the release, please rep