Il 18/08/2012 01:08, Theodore Ts'o ha scritto:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:47:04AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
Great. I'll remove the calls for ext3/ext4 when I'll submit the
second version of the patch.
FYI, I have the following patch my ext4 tree, so I could do more
intensive testing. I'll
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:47:04AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Great. I'll remove the calls for ext3/ext4 when I'll submit the
> second version of the patch.
FYI, I have the following patch my ext4 tree, so I could do more
intensive testing. I'll let folks know if anything goes horribly
wrong
Il 16/08/2012 21:19, Theodore Ts'o ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:39:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
On Thu 16-08-12 12:00:26, Marco Stornelli wrote:
From: Marco Stornelli
Replaced lock and unlock super with a new fs mutex s_lock.
Hum, is the lock needed at all? Remount & unfreeze bot
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:39:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 16-08-12 12:00:26, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> > From: Marco Stornelli
> >
> > Replaced lock and unlock super with a new fs mutex s_lock.
> Hum, is the lock needed at all? Remount & unfreeze both run with s_umount
> held for writin
On Thu 16-08-12 12:00:26, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> From: Marco Stornelli
>
> Replaced lock and unlock super with a new fs mutex s_lock.
Hum, is the lock needed at all? Remount & unfreeze both run with s_umount
held for writing. Thus we already have exclusion between these two calls.
The same se
From: Marco Stornelli
Replaced lock and unlock super with a new fs mutex s_lock.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
---
diff -Nurp linux-3.6-rc1-orig/fs/ext3/ext3.h linux-3.6-rc1/fs/ext3/ext3.h
--- linux-3.6-rc1-orig/fs/ext3/ext3.h 2012-08-16 09:37:31.0 +0200
+++ linux-3.6-rc1/fs/ext3/ex
6 matches
Mail list logo
