On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:01:29 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > From: Lu Baolu
> > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 3:26 PM
> >
> > On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without
> > > PASIDs. The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:25:57 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without
> > PASIDs. The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero
> > PASID for SVA usage.
> >
> > This patch adds a check for PASID va
> From: Lu Baolu
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 3:26 PM
>
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
> > The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
> > usage.
> >
> > This patch adds a check for P
On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
usage.
This patch adds a check for PASID value such that devTLB flush with
PASID is used for SVA case. This is more
DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
usage.
This patch adds a check for PASID value such that devTLB flush with
PASID is used for SVA case. This is more efficient in that multiple
PASIDs can b
5 matches
Mail list logo