* Linus Walleij [131010 08:43]:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > I was thinking I'll set up an immutable branch for the three
> > pinctrl patches against -rc4 then both you and I can merge
> > them in as needed. Does that work for you?
>
> Hm it's fair enough to have
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> I was thinking I'll set up an immutable branch for the three
> pinctrl patches against -rc4 then both you and I can merge
> them in as needed. Does that work for you?
Hm it's fair enough to have them in your tree if they do
not collide ... e
* Linus Walleij [131009 06:51]:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus W,
> >
> > Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
>
> Yes, after good explanations to my whimsical questions only this:
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij
OK thanks :)
> I guess y
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Linus W,
>
> Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
Yes, after good explanations to my whimsical questions only this:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
I guess you'll take these patches through ARM SoC?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus W,
>>
>> Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
>
> I have no problems with this patch #3, as it is just changing syntax,
> not semantics.
>
> The problems
* Linus Walleij [131008 05:03]:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > Hi Linus W,
> >
> > Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
>
> I have no problems with this patch #3, as it is just changing syntax,
> not semantics.
>
> The problems start with patc
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Linus W,
>
> Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
I have no problems with this patch #3, as it is just changing syntax,
not semantics.
The problems start with patch #4.
I am tormented with mixed feelings about this,
Hi Linus W,
Any comments on the pinctrl patches 3 - 5 in this series?
These are badly needed to not break omap3 PM support when
we're moving to device tree based booting.
* Tony Lindgren [131002 22:50]:
> Let's replace is_pinconf with flags and add struct pcs_soc_data
> so we can support SoC sp
Let's replace is_pinconf with flags and add struct pcs_soc_data
so we can support SoC specific features like pin wake-up events.
Done in collaboration with Roger Quadros .
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi
Cc: Grygorii Strashko
Cc: Prakash Manjunathappa
Cc: Haojian Zhuang
Cc: Linus Walleij
Cc: linux-kernel
9 matches
Mail list logo
