Re: [PATCH 3/4] regulator/axp20x: use axp2xx consolidated header

2014-09-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:26:50PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > but is it really worth the effort of renaming everything? That's > > going to cause problems for things like the stable workflow. > sorry for the late reply. IMHO, consistent and correct naming has > longer term

Re: [PATCH 3/4] regulator/axp20x: use axp2xx consolidated header

2014-09-11 Thread Jacob Pan
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:25:16 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:24:05PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: > > AXP20x driver has been extended to support axp288 variant. Header > > file and common data structures has also been renamed to suit the > > new scope of devices supported. > > > >

Re: [PATCH 3/4] regulator/axp20x: use axp2xx consolidated header

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:24:05PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: > AXP20x driver has been extended to support axp288 variant. Header file > and common data structures has also been renamed to suit the new > scope of devices supported. > > This patch makes use of the renamed header and structure. > -#in

[PATCH 3/4] regulator/axp20x: use axp2xx consolidated header

2014-09-08 Thread Jacob Pan
AXP20x driver has been extended to support axp288 variant. Header file and common data structures has also been renamed to suit the new scope of devices supported. This patch makes use of the renamed header and structure. Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan --- drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 6 +++