On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:52:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:56:36AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Just an optimization.
>
> Does it make sense to split the thing in two? One where you apply
> _unlocked and then one where you apply _fast?
Yes but I already dro
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:56:36AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Just an optimization.
Does it make sense to split the thing in two? One where you apply
_unlocked and then one where you apply _fast?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a mess
Hi Andrea,
On 10/01/2014 04:56 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 8f5330d..6606c10 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int lookup_node(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
> long addr)
> struct page *p;
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:56:36AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> index f74fc0c..cd20669 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> @@ -198,8 +198,7 @@ static int non_ato
Just an optimization.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli
---
drivers/dma/iovlock.c | 10 ++
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c | 6 ++
drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtv-udma.c | 6 ++
drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c| 3 +--
drivers/scsi/st.c | 10 ++---
5 matches
Mail list logo