On 01/17/2014 05:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:37:56AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
Sidenote: actually this modalias/module loading issue is different
and not related to stable ACPI i2c/spi slave device names.
Oh, I'd been under the impression that it was the rewrite that w
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:37:56AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 01/16/2014 09:46 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >This is needed for ACPI because we rewrite the device names to give us
> >stable names. With OF for I2C and SPI nothing bus specific is done that
> >affects this stuff so the default beha
On 01/16/2014 09:46 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:05:09PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
This seems a gap to me but I'm not 100% sure.
I saw Grant Likely introduced the OF style MODALIAS to platform bus, and
OF style registration
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 02:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 16, 2014 04:04:35 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:08 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/driv
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 04:04:35 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:08 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > index 3a94b79..2f4aea2 100644
> > > --- a/
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:05:09PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I wonder why we don't have/need that with CONFIG_OF? Because probably
> > nobody is using modules with i2c devices there?
> This seems a gap to me but I'm not 100% sure.
> I saw
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:28:19PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> > all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
> >
> > Currently, in Platform, I2C
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:27 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > index d74c0b3..c4c5588 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> > @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:28 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> > all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
> >
> > Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
>
> Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, the ACPI style driver matching
> is supported by invoking
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index d74c0b3..c4c5588 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct
> device_driver *drv)
> static int i2c_device_uevent(struct d
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:08 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > index 3a94b79..2f4aea2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > @@ -677
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:46:37PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index 3a94b79..2f4aea2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -677,7 +677,13 @@ static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 14:41 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:00:17PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:35 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > > ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID st
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:00:17PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:35 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> > > all of these strings can be used for both driver
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
Currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, the ACPI style driver matching
is supported by invoking acpi_driver_match_device() in bus .match() callback.
But, the module
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:35 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> > all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
>
> > But currently, in Platform, I2C and S
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
> But currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, only the ACPI style
> driver matching is supported by i
ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
But currently, in Platform, I2C and SPI bus, only the ACPI style
driver matching is supported by invoking acpi_driver_match_device()
in bus .match() callback.
This
19 matches
Mail list logo
