On Tuesday 14 October 2014 01:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote:
>> On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> Two problems:
>>> - I'm missing patches 1 and 2.
>
>> These patches are same like this one,
>> [1] https://lkml.or
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Two problems:
> > - I'm missing patches 1 and 2.
> These patches are same like this one,
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/58
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/52
Yo
On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote:
>> There is no need to init .owner field.
>>
>> Based on the patch from Peter Griffin
>> "mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver"
>>
>> This patch remove
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:08PM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote:
> There is no need to init .owner field.
>
> Based on the patch from Peter Griffin
> "mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver"
>
> This patch removes the superfluous .owner field for drivers which
> use the m
There is no need to init .owner field.
Based on the patch from Peter Griffin
"mmc: remove .owner field for drivers using module_platform_driver"
This patch removes the superfluous .owner field for drivers which
use the module_platform_driver API, as this is overridden in
platform_driver_register
5 matches
Mail list logo