Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: increase do_write_buffer() timeout

2013-06-05 Thread Huang Shijie
于 2013年06月06日 05:08, Brian Norris 写道: > Note that a 2-jiffy timeout does not, in fact, totally resolve my > problems; with a timeout of 2 jiffies, I still get a timeout that > (according to getnstimeofday()) occurs after only 56us. It does since the 2-jiffy does not resolve your problem, i suggest

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: increase do_write_buffer() timeout

2013-06-05 Thread Imre Deak
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 14:08 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > Adding a few others > > For reference, this thread started with this patch: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-June/047164.html > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Brian Norris > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: increase do_write_buffer() timeout

2013-06-05 Thread Brian Norris
Adding a few others For reference, this thread started with this patch: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-June/047164.html On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Huang Shijie wrote: >> 于 2013年06月04日 09:46, Brian Norris 写道: >>>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: increase do_write_buffer() timeout

2013-06-05 Thread Brian Norris
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Huang Shijie wrote: > 于 2013年06月04日 09:46, Brian Norris 写道: >> After various tests, it seems simply that the timeout is not long enough >> for my system; increasing it by a few jiffies prevented all failures >> (testing for 12+ hours). There is no harm in increasin