Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size

2017-09-06 Thread Chao Yu
On 2017/9/7 12:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 09/06, Chao Yu wrote: >> Hi Jaegeuk, >> >> Do we have time to test and stabilize this new feature before merge window? > > Let's try this in the next merge window. It's too tight to test now. :) OK, :) Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >> On 2017/9/4 18:58,

Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size

2017-09-06 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 09/06, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > Do we have time to test and stabilize this new feature before merge window? Let's try this in the next merge window. It's too tight to test now. :) > > Thanks, > > On 2017/9/4 18:58, Chao Yu wrote: > > Now, in product, more and more features based on

Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size

2017-09-05 Thread Chao Yu
Hi Jaegeuk, Do we have time to test and stabilize this new feature before merge window? Thanks, On 2017/9/4 18:58, Chao Yu wrote: > Now, in product, more and more features based on file encryption were > introduced, their demand of xattr space is increasing, however, inline > xattr has fixed-siz

[PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size

2017-09-04 Thread Chao Yu
Now, in product, more and more features based on file encryption were introduced, their demand of xattr space is increasing, however, inline xattr has fixed-size of 200 bytes, once inline xattr space is full, new increased xattr data would occupy additional xattr block which may bring us more space