Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: reliable stacktraces

2018-08-10 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:03:11PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote: > This is more an RFC in the original sense: is this basically > the correct approach? (as I had to tweak the API a bit). > > In particular the code does not detect interrupts and exception > frames, and does not yet check whether the c

[PATCH 3/3] arm64: reliable stacktraces

2018-08-10 Thread Torsten Duwe
This is more an RFC in the original sense: is this basically the correct approach? (as I had to tweak the API a bit). In particular the code does not detect interrupts and exception frames, and does not yet check whether the code address is valid. The latter check would also have to be omitted for