Re: [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: use list_next_entry instead of list_entry_next

2015-11-17 Thread John Johansen
On 11/16/2015 05:46 AM, Geliang Tang wrote: > list_next_entry has been defined in list.h, so I replace list_entry_next > with it. > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang yep looks good Acked-by: John Johansen > --- > security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 8 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 d

Re: [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: use list_next_entry instead of list_entry_next

2015-11-17 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 09:46:33PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote: > list_next_entry has been defined in list.h, so I replace list_entry_next > with it. > > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang Seems reasonable. Acked-by: Serge Hallyn > --- > security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 8 +++- > 1 file changed,

[PATCH 3/3] apparmor: use list_next_entry instead of list_entry_next

2015-11-16 Thread Geliang Tang
list_next_entry has been defined in list.h, so I replace list_entry_next with it. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang --- security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c b/security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c index ad4fa