On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 13:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 01:09 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >
> >> I think the solution is to introduce some new shared/common location for
> >> shared/common *.dtsi files, into the kernel tree,
On 07/23/2013 11:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 13:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/23/2013 01:09 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
I think the solution is to introduce some new shared/common location for
shar
On 07/23/2013 01:55 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 13:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/23/2013 01:09 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>
I think the solution is to introduce some new shared/common location for
shar
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Or perhaps, we could move *.dts around in the kernel to match the
> proposed DT tree structure before that point in time?
>
> >> we will still need
> >> to copy dt-bindings into the kernel. Also, I think we should move all
> >> dts files out of arch su
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 13:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 01:09 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >
> >> I think the solution is to introduce some new shared/common location for
> >> shared/common *.dtsi files, into the kernel tree,
On 07/23/2013 01:09 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
>> I think the solution is to introduce some new shared/common location for
>> shared/common *.dtsi files, into the kernel tree, in the interim.
>>
>> When *.dts move out of the kernel, this co
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:59 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I think the solution is to introduce some new shared/common location for
> shared/common *.dtsi files, into the kernel tree, in the interim.
>
> When *.dts move out of the kernel, this common location can simply be
> consumed as part of t
On 07/23/2013 10:14 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 21:03 +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/22/2013 11:50 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 04:19 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
+F:include/dt-bindings
>>>
>>> One thing we didn't finish talking about was the ques
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 21:03 +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 11:50 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 04:19 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> +F:include/dt-bindings
> >
> > One thing we didn't finish talking about was the question if this
> > directory is supposed to co
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>
>> My own selfish desire is to easily separate emails for DT bindings and
>> DT core code. I suppose I could do that with a suffix on my email address.
>
> And I've had the reverse problem: Sorting out the DTC
> and libfdt patches from the n
>
> My own selfish desire is to easily separate emails for DT bindings and
> DT core code. I suppose I could do that with a suffix on my email address.
And I've had the reverse problem: Sorting out the DTC
and libfdt patches from the noise. :-)
jdl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On 07/21/2013 07:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/19/2013 10:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> +OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
>>> +M: Pawel Moll
>>> +M: Mark Rutland
>>> +M: Stephen Warren
>>> +M: Ian Campbell
>>
On 07/22/2013 11:50 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 04:19 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>> +F: include/dt-bindings
>
> One thing we didn't finish talking about was the question if this
> directory is supposed to contain *.dtsi files as well? The obvious
> problem I have is a vexpress m
>
> > Perhaps it is time to also place the official repo
> > of the Device Tree Compiler on git,kernel.org as well?
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Now that I'm no longer at IBM, and don't have the associated
> complications with their Legal department, I'd rather like to resume
> having direct commi
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely
>>> wrote:
>>> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they u
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 04:19 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> +F: include/dt-bindings
One thing we didn't finish talking about was the question if this
directory is supposed to contain *.dtsi files as well? The obvious
problem I have is a vexpress motherboard being (well, actually not bein
right now)
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:46:11AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Grant Likely
> > wrote
> > :
> >
> > > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> > > We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> > > bindings. Th
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 01:36 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> >>>
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 01:36 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely
> >>> wrote
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely
>>> wrote:
>>> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 10:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> +OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
>> +M: Pawel Moll
>> +M: Mark Rutland
>> +M: Stephen Warren
>> +M: Ian Campbell
>
> You can add me. I was not intending to step down.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Perhaps it is time to also place the official repo
> of the Device Tree Compiler on git,kernel.org as well?
I'm fine with that. I can't say I'm excited about options like github.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
On 07/19/2013 10:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> This group still needs to work out a process for maint
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Grant Likely wrote
> :
>
> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> > We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> > bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
> >
> > This group still needs to w
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
>> > We've got a group of volunteers willing to take
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> > We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> > bindings. This patch adds them to the MA
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> This group still needs to work out a process
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> This group still needs to work out a process
Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
This group still needs to work out a process for maintainership and how
they are going to work together. I r
29 matches
Mail list logo
